This article on Podcasting & Vodcasting was interesting in a sense, but not one of my favorites. There seems to be a tad bit more steps that require to produce Podcast content. Most of the work that involves does not take a lot of skill if you want to cut to the chase and broadcast it. However, in reading this article, more and more people are in demand of higher quality Podcasting. That is where more technical skills are required. I’m sure all of these steps are easy to do and one can get the hang of it. Personally, I do not know if I would have a passion of going out and capturing and editing the content, publishing the content to a site, subscribing the content with a RSS News Reader, Downloading the content into content Management, and playing content on download device. In my own personal opinion, that would be more steps than I would usually take. It comes down on the individual who has an interest in the tool itself. I find other web tools more fascinating, than others, but Podcasting & Vodcasting is a tool I never new about, so therefore it is something new I have learned. Many people find Podcasting very useful. Everyone from students to teachers can find this tool useful for their everyday daily usage. I’m sure I can find many ways of using it, but I will stick to my other preferred tools I use on a daily basis. Nothing against it, it’s just not my thing. The minute I hear that all you need is a microphone, then that leads me to know there is no visual aspect to it, therefore it is not an interest to me. Sorry guys/girls, but I am a both audio and visual, not just audio. Only way I could possibly find a use for it is attending meetings with speakers who speak on useful information that I need. I can record the content and put it to use.
On the other hand, VOD, is more appealing to myself do to the visual aspect of it. Seems more complex in the aspect of equipment and more complex when it gets in to the technical aspect of it. The cost of producing VOD’s is more highly in cost than a Podcast, but I find this tool more appealing to myself. Yes, I know you have to have a pricy camera that you will have to know the capabilities of it in order to get the results that you are looking for. It is at a must to have higher quality and needs to be shown on a larger screen. Movie Maker and iMovie are both software that can used to create VODcasts. It is more appealing and interesting, but more pricy, therefore, probably wouldn’t get in to it as well. I am interested in seeing what people have done with their own personal VODcasts though. I came to the conclusion that both tools can serve a great purpose to different individuals with different needs. I can find both useful in one way or another. However, both have a glitch that does not meet my needs. On the Podcasting tool, you have limitations with just audio. On the VODcasting, you have visual, but very pricy equipment that one must have in order to produce high quality content. It’s like any other tool though, you must have some sort of passion for it to by far see past those issue. Many people think I am crazy when they see how much Adobe packets (non-student prices) cost at stores and the price of Macs, but I have a passion for it, therefore I don’t let those little issues get in my way. Podcasting and VODcasting is something new I have learned and will not say I will never get in to it, but these two tools are not on my favs list for now.Marco
